Home
Latest News
Online Features
About Us
Bookshop
Events
Membership
Qualifications
Journal
Certification
Policy
Links
Detailed Search
Contact Us

The Royal Society
for the Promotion of Health
38A St. George's Drive,
London, SW1V 4BH
 
Tel: (+44) (0) 20 7630 0121
Fax: (+44) (0) 20 7976 6847
 
rsph@rsph.org

Guidelines for contributors

This page offers advice on how to submit contributions to The Society's journal.


Aims and scope

JRSH is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal for practicing health professionals, featuring research and reviews, as well as news, opinion and feature articles.

The readership of JRSH is comprised of practicing professionals across a broad range of disciplines, including environmental health, the food industry, health and safety, building and engineering, health promotion, education, medicine, dentistry, and government, amongst others.

JRSH is produced bi-monthly in January, March, May, July, September and November. Regular features include: Current Topics, short opinion-based articles on topical issues; peer-reviewed articles and original and secondary research of general interest which crosses the boundaries of different disciplines; book and software reviews; letters to the Editor; as well as global news and features on public health and updates on The Society's work.

We carry editorial comment, global news and feature articles to help keep our readers informed and up to date with developments and debate in the field of public health.

JRSH's primary aim is to be an invaluable resource for The Society's Members, who are health-promoting professionals from many disciplines, including environmental health, health and safety, food safety and nutrition, building and engineering, primary care, academia and government.

News and features are produced by in-house staff. Unsolicited contributions will not be considered.

Book and software reviews are commissioned by editorial staff. Unsolicited reviews will not be considered. Commissioned contributors should refer to the separate JRSH book review guidelines. Books or software for review can be sent to the usual Society address marked for the Publications Department.

Return to top of page


Guidelines for submission

Authors are asked to read these guidelines carefully as the editors reserve the right to reject papers that do not conform to these requirements.

Manuscripts must be written in English and should be submitted in a standard electronic format (MS Word; Rich Text; PDF; etc). The manuscript file should be submitted on compact disc or similar format. Submissions can be emailed directly to editorial staff by prior agreement. Authors submitting by email must take responsibility for confirming that files have been received by editorial staff. Submissions will only be accepted in electronic format. Submissions by fax are not acceptable.

Figures and photographs are encouraged across all article categories. These should be submitted electronically as standard high-resolution files (e.g. jpeg files of over 1 mb; tif files; etc). Slides and prints may be acceptable upon prior agreement with editorial staff.

All submissions must conform to our presentation and house style requirements as described below.

Submission for peer review
A covering letter signed by all of the authors must be submitted with articles, and original or secondary research papers submitted for publication in JRSH.

Email submissions should be sent to JRSH editorial staff with record of approval from all authors' named email accounts: either paste complete email texts (including when sent, to whom and who from) into a new email, or forward submission email through all author accounts before sending to JRSH.

The letter must contain the following information:

  • Why the submission is appropriate for publication in JRSH and what it adds to existing health promotion knowledge.
  • Which article category the submission is for.
  • Confirmation that the paper meets with the requirements for that category as laid out in this document, stating word count and confirming that references have been formatted in the Vancouver style as detailed below.
  • Confirmation that the paper has not been published elsewhere.
  • Declaration of competing interests or the absence of competing interests and disclosure of all sources of funding.
  • Original research must declare ethical approval from an appropriate body and consent from participants.
  • Name the corresponding author and provide full contact details.

Author/s should also include written consent from those individuals being acknowledged in their paper.

Return to top of page


Article categories

Original research
Original research papers are peer-reviewed by subject specialists. Submissions will need to show appropriate ethical approval. Length: 2,000-4,000 words. Requisites: key words, key points, structured abstract, rationale, subjects/methods/materials, results, discussion, conclusions, references.

Secondary research
Secondary research papers are peer-reviewed by subject specialists. Length: 2,000-4,000 words. Requisites: key words, key points, abstract, rationale, subjects/methods/materials, results, discussion, conclusions, references.

Articles
Articles must be of general interest and preference will be given to those appropriate for publication in up-coming themed issues. Length: 2,000-4,000 words. Requisites: key words, key points, abstract, introduction, headings/subheadings and boxed content (eg background information) as appropriate, conclusions, references.

Current Topics and Opinions
This section provides a forum for well-referenced, expert opinion on topical issues in public health. Appropriate submissions might be: proposals for action; examples of good practice; criticism of current practice or policy; or responses to published statements. Length: 500-1000 words. Requisites: concise presentation of facts and 10-15 references. Items submitted for this section are not subject to peer review.

Letters to the Editor
Letters to the Editor for publication in JRSH should reflect journal content, giving precise details for cross-referencing purposes. Length: 350 words maximum. Letters can include references where appropriate.

Return to top of page


The peer review process

All manuscript submissions are acknowledged on receipt and are given an identification number. Manuscripts are evaluated in the first instance by in-house editorial staff, and may be rejected after in-house evaluation alone. If the paper is considered to be of interest, it will be passed on to two expert referees for peer review. Manuscripts will not be accepted for publication until approval has been obtained from two referees.

Should the two original referees express opposing views, the manuscript will be sent to a third referee. Manuscripts will be sent to a third referee when either of the first two referees request that approval is sought from a specialist in a different area (such as a statistician).

Authors may not request that their manuscript be sent to a third or subsequent referee on grounds of a failure to gain clear approval or rejection from referees originally selected by editorial staff. Editorial staff will use their discretion to adjudge when a referee has failed to review a manuscript to a satisfactory standard and will in such cases pass the manuscript to an additional referee.

Manuscripts will be rejected if they fail to gain approval from two referees after a fourth draft. Manuscripts will be rejected if the peer review process goes beyond nine months from original receipt due to revisions or delays on the part of the author(s). Editorial staff will use a points system to determine whether a manuscript will be rejected when: two referees have recommended revision; one referee has recommended revision and a second has rejected; two or more of three referees have recommended revision.

Referees are asked to comment on and recommend changes to the original manuscript. Their comments are an invitation to the author(s) to revise the original manuscript and do not represent acceptance or a promise of publication, and subsequent drafts can and may be rejected by the referees or by editorial staff if the author(s) fail to satisfactorily address issues raised by referees or editorial staff.

When submitting revisions, changes made should be indicated on the revised draft. It is also necessary for the author(s) to outline their responses to the referees' comments in a covering letter.

JRSH operates a 'double-blind' review process, which means that the identities of the referees and the authors are kept confidential from one-another. Anything that can potentially reveal the identity of the referee to the author or vice-versa is omitted from all communications.

The Managing Editor has the final say in whether or not a paper is accepted or rejected for publication.

In the case of rejection, final comments will be passed on to the author(s).

Authors are informed of the final decision, which is normally reached around three months after original receipt.

Return to top of page


Publication

Before publication author(s) will be asked to transfer the copyright of their contribution to The Society.

Material accepted for publication will be edited at the discretion of editorial staff.

Each author will receive one complimentary copy of JRSH.

No guaranteed publication date can be given. Editorial decisions are made by the Managing Editor, Honorary Editor and, in the case of themed issues, the Guest Editor, in order to best serve the interests of JRSH and The Society. JRSH editorial policy is set by the Editorial Board.

Return to top of page


Presentation and house style

Text must be doubled spaced.

All pages must be numbered.

The first page should include the title of the submission, and the full names of all authors with degrees and institutional affiliations at the time of writing, postal and email addresses, telephone and fax number for correspondence. The corresponding author should be clearly labeled as such and listed first.

The second page should only have the title of the paper, the abstract and five key words.

The main body of text should start on the third page.

References and acknowledgements should each start on a new page.

Tables, figures and text boxes should appear on separate pages at the end of the document and be labeled appropriately.

Abstract
Abstracts should be concise and to the point. Abstracts for original research papers should be structured under the following headings: aims, methods, results, and conclusions. Abstracts should be no more than 400 words.

Key words
The author(s) must provide 5 key words.

Key points
The author(s) must provide key points noting the original contribution made by their article/paper.

Text boxes
Text boxes should be used for tangential information, such as contact details or background information of organizations relevant to the article, lists, very short case studies or descriptions of related research/projects, and details of elements of a study or project, such as a survey, which, for reasons of clarity, are best removed from the main body text.

Acknowledgements
The author(s) must include written consent from the individuals being acknowledged in their paper. The 'Acknowledgement' page will not be forwarded to the referees.

Acronyms/abbreviations
Spell out abbreviation and acronyms on first use in the text and abbreviate subsequently.

Numbers
Spell out numbers one to ten, unless a measurement. Always have a zero before a decimal point. Do not use a comma in thousands but do use one in tens of thousands and above. Spell out and hyphenate one-half, two-thirds, etc.

Measurements
Use standard SI abbreviations. Leave a space between a value and its unit except for % and oC.

Return to top of page


References

JRSH follows the Vancouver referencing style.

References are numbered consecutively in the order in which they appear in the text. A list of references at the end of the article should give full details of the publications referenced, including authors' names and initials of all authors (unless there are more than six, in which case only the first six should be given followed by et al); the title of the journal (abbreviated according to 'Index Medicus'); the year of publication; the volume number; and the first and last page numbers.

The examples below are given as a guide. If in doubt, or if you need more information on the Vancouver referencing style, please contact the Managing Editor.

Examples:

Journal articles
Details should be arranged in the following sequence:

Authors' name and initials
Title of article
Title of journal (abbreviated according to 'Index Medicus')
Year of publication
Volume number
First and last page numbers

Article with 1 to 6 authors
Aston G. Food hygiene in hospitals - are we training the right people? J Roy Soc Health 2000;120:211

Article with more than 6 authors
Dennis CM, McNeil KD, Dunning J, Stewart S, Friend PJ, Alexander G, et al. Heart lung liver transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1996;15:536-8

Journal article with no author
Cancer in South Africa. S Afr Med J 1994;84:15

Organisation as author
The Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Clinical exercise stress testing. Safety and performance guidelines. Med J Aust 1996;164:282-4

Newspaper article
Godinez V. Men slowly gravitating to nursing professions - Traditions, salaries among factor impeding change. Dallas Morning News 2001, 18 March

Books
References to books should give the names of editors, place of publication, publisher, and year.

Details should be arranged in the following sequence:

Author/editor(s)
Title of book
Edition of book
Place of publication
Publisher
Date of publication

Book with a personal author
Ashton L. Accident Prevention Among Older People: Approaches in Practice, A Series of Case Studies. First edition. London: Health Education Authority, 1998

Book with editor as author
Norman IJ, Redfern SJ, editors. Mental Health Care for Elderly People. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996

Organisation as author and publisher
Prescription Pricing Authority. PACT Standard Report, BNF Version No 34. London: Prescription Pricing Authority, NHS, 1999

Conference proceedings
Kimura J, Shibasaki H, editors. Recent Advances in Clinical Neurophysiology. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of EMG and Clinical Neurophysiology; 15-19 October 1995, Kyoto, Japan. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1996

Scientific or technical report
Smith P, Golladay K. Payment for Durable Medical Equipment Billed During Skilled Nursing Facility Stays. Final report. Dallas (TX): Department of Health and Human Services (US), Office of Evaluation and Inspections; 1994 Oct.Report No.: HHSIGOEI69200860.

Dissertation
Kaplan SJ. Post-hospital Home Health Care: the Elderly's Access and Utilization [dissertation]. St Louis (MO): Washington University, 1995

Chapters in books
Details should be arranged in the following sequence:

Author of article/chapter
Chapter title
Editor(s) of book
Title of book
Place of publication
Publisher
Year of publication
Article or chapter pages

Chapter with personal author
Cribb A, Dines A. What is Health? In: Dines A, Cribb A, editors. Health Promotion: Concepts and Practice. London: Blackwell, 1993. p. 112-4

Chapter with no author
Solving the Y2K problem. In Bowd D, editor. Technology today and tomorrow. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1997. p. 27

World Wide Web page
Clarke C. UIAA Mountain Medicine Centre Information Sheet 1. Mountain Sickness, Oedema and Travel to High Altitudes. International Union of Alpine Associations (UIAA) Mountain Medicine Centre, 1999. Available online at: www.thebmc.co.uk/mm/mm1.html (accessed 21 February 2002)

World Wide Web page (no author)
Educating America for the 21st Century: Developing a Strategic Plan for Educational Leadership. Available online at: www.ilt.columbia.edu/CONF/EdPlan.html (accessed 15 May 1999)

World Wide Web Home page
Curtin University of Technology. Homepage of the Curtin University of Technology: www.curtin.edu.au (accessed 12 June 2000)

In press
Avoid using personal communications and information from manuscripts not yet 'in-press'. Need to obtain written permission to cite such papers as well as verification that they have been accepted for publication. Information from manuscripts submitted but not accepted should be cited in the text as 'unpublished observations' with written permission from the source.

Return to top of page

Contact details

Please send submissions to the following address:

Publications department, The Royal Society of Health, RSH House, 38A St George's Drive, London SW1V 4BH

Tel: +44 (0)20 7630 0121 x 204 Fax: +44 (0)20 7976 6847

Email: publications@rsph.org

Return to top of page